General Rule of Interpretation 3(b) governs one specific and often misunderstood scenario in HS classification: how to classify goods made up of multiple components when no single heading fully describes the product.

GRI 3(b) is not a shortcut, a default rule, or a catch-all for bundled products. It is a conditional rule that applies only when precise legal criteria are met. When misapplied, it leads directly to misclassification, incorrect duty rates, and audit exposure.

This article explains only what matters for GRI 3(b):

• When GRI 3(b) applies and when it does not
• What legally qualifies as a “set put up for retail sale”
• How essential character must be determined
• How GRI 3(b) is displaced by special notes or specific headings
• Practical, verified examples showing correct outcomes

The goal is clarity, not coverage.

---

1. When GRI 3(b) Actually Applies

GRI 3(b) applies only when all of the following conditions exist:

1. The goods consist of multiple components or articles

2. Those components are, taken individually, classifiable under different headings

3. No single heading describes the goods as a whole

4. No heading is more specific than the others

5. The goods qualify as either:

   • Composite goods
   • Mixtures
   • Goods put up in sets for retail sale

If any of these conditions fails, GRI 3(b) does not apply.

This is critical. Many products that appear to be “sets” never reach GRI 3(b) because a specific heading already resolves classification.

---

2. What Qualifies as a “Set Put Up for Retail Sale”

For GRI 3(b), a retail set must meet all three legal criteria defined in the Explanatory Notes:

1. At least two different articles classifiable in different headings
2. Packaged together for sale directly to the consumer, without repacking
3. Combined to meet a specific need or perform a specific activity

All three elements are mandatory.

Examples that qualify as sets:

• Manicure kits designed for nail care
• Children’s art kits designed for drawing or painting
• Cooking utensil kits designed for food preparation
• Cold-weather kits designed to keep the wearer warm

Examples that do not qualify:

• Assorted items bundled for convenience or promotion
• Multi-item packages serving unrelated purposes
• Collections lacking a unifying activity

If the items do not serve one clearly defined activity, GRI 3(b) cannot be used.

---

3. Essential Character Under GRI 3(b)

Once a product qualifies as a set, GRI 3(b) requires classification according to the component that gives the set its essential character.

Essential character is not subjective. It must be determined using objective factors identified in the Explanatory Notes, such as:

• The nature of the component
• Its role in the function of the set
• Relative value
• Relative weight or bulk
• Consumer perception of what defines the product

No single factor is decisive in every case. The analysis must be evidence-based and documented.

If no component clearly predominates, GRI 3(b) fails and the classification moves to GRI 3(c).

---

4. When GRI 3(b) Is Displaced by Special Rules

GRI 3(b) does not override:

• Headings that explicitly provide for sets
• Section or Chapter Notes that require separate classification

Textile Garments and Note 14 to Section XI

Note 14 requires garments of different headings to be classified separately, even if sold together, unless a heading explicitly allows set classification.

Examples:

• A blouse and trousers sold together must be classified separately
• Pajamas may classify together because the heading explicitly provides for them

In these cases, GRI 3(b) is legally displaced.

---

5. Distinguishing Sets from Composite Goods

Before applying GRI 3(b), it is essential to identify what type of goods you are dealing with.

Composite Goods

• Components form a single, inseparable article
• Separation would destroy functionality
• Example: a flashlight with an integrated compass

Composite goods are treated as one article.

Sets for Retail Sale

• Components remain separate and independently usable
• Packaged together for a specific activity
• Example: a knife, peeler, and cutting board sold as a starter kit

Only sets require essential-character analysis under GRI 3(b).

---

6. Verified Examples of GRI 3(b) in Practice

Chef’s Starter Kit: Knife, Peeler, Cutting Board

Classification: 8211.92.90.30

Why GRI 3(b) applies:

• Components fall under different headings
• No heading covers the goods as a whole
• Items are packaged together for a single activity: food preparation
• No heading is more specific than the others

Essential character:

• The chef’s knife performs the dominant functional role
• The peeler and cutting board are auxiliary
• The set derives its identity from the knife

Result: the entire set is classified as the knife.

This is a textbook GRI 3(b) outcome.

---

Children’s Art Kit: Crayons, Markers, Paints, Brush

Outcome: GRI 3(b) applies, but essential character cannot be determined.

• Multiple plausible headings
• No component clearly predominates by function or value

Result: classification defaults to GRI 3(c), using the heading that appears last in numerical order.

This demonstrates that reaching GRI 3(b) does not guarantee an essential-character decision.

---

7. Why GRI 3(b) Is Commonly Misapplied

Most errors arise from incorrect assumptions:

• Assuming any bundled product is a “set”
• Skipping the legal definition of a specific activity
• Assigning essential character without objective evidence
• Ignoring special notes that override GRI 3(b)

GRI 3(b) is narrow, conditional, and evidence-driven. Treating it as a default rule is a compliance risk.

---

Conclusion: Applying GRI 3(b) Correctly

GRI 3(b) is powerful only when applied precisely. It requires:

• Verifying that the goods legally qualify as a set
• Confirming no specific heading or note overrides the rule
• Determining essential character based on objective criteria
• Accepting GRI 3(c) when essential character cannot be established

When applied correctly, GRI 3(b) produces defensible, repeatable classifications. When applied casually, it creates audit exposure.

Understanding the limits of GRI 3(b) is just as important as understanding how it works.